The reader’s situation
Roles, candidates and client requirements evolve in parallel. The proposed reader is a recruiting team coordinating several searches and wants to produce an approved video.
The specific decision
The final decision should be attributable and tied to a specific version. Restrict access to candidate information and record permission to use it.
Proposed evaluation
Prepare a 45-second product explanation with a corrected name, captions and a second-language version.
- Request a change after approval and check what becomes unapproved.
- Use synthetic candidate data to test a handoff and deletion request.
- Use the same script and reference assets in every trial.
Evidence to gather
- The current official documentation for the exact plan and feature.
- The plan name, region, billing term and date of each price checked.
- An original trial record showing the input, output and observed limitation.
- A clear explanation of how this lens changes the buying decision for this audience.
- Evidence that this page answers a distinct reader need rather than repeating another guide.
Questions for the category
- Which model or avatar is included in the selected plan?
- Are downloads, captions and commercial use included?
- What happens to unused credits and failed generations?
Editorial acceptance criteria
A finished article should answer its decision question with evidence and a concrete example. Merge it into an existing guide if the answer is materially the same. Remove irrelevant candidate tools, explain uncertainty and keep pricing claims dated.
Keyword volume and difficulty have not been measured for this brief. No product ranking, affiliate approval or purchase recommendation has been established.